U.S. Department of Health and Human Services home page Health Resources and Services Administration home page U.S. Department of Health and Human Services home page Health Resources and Services Administration home page H I V/AIDS Bureau (H A B) home page Contact Us Search
skip header and navigation
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services AdministrationU.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services AdministrationH I V/AIDS Bureau (H A B)Contact UsSearch
three people in a meetingman sitting by the waterman talking on a telephonegirl sitting on the flooryoung couple
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services home page Health Resources and Services Administration home page U.S. Department of Health and Human Services home page Health Resources and Services Administration home page H I V/AIDS Bureau (H A B) home page Contact Us Search
About HIV/AIDS Bureau
Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program
Law & Policy
Programs
Special Initiative
Reports & Studies
Tools for Grantees
Data
News & Events
Education & Training
Publications
Links

 
Tools for Grantees: A Pocket Guide to Adult HIV/AIDS Treatment
February 2006 edition


< Previous | Home
6 Occupational HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis (PEP)
    Considerations in Occupational Exposure to HIV
    Occupational Postexposure Table 1. Exposure Contingencies
    Occupational Postexposure Table 2. Indications for HIV PEP
    Management of Health Care Workers (HCWs) With Potential HIV Exposure
    Occupational Postexposure Table 3. Recommended Regimens
    Resources for Consultation

Considerations in Occupational Exposure to HIV   TOP

PEP Guidelines

Updated US Public Health Service Guidelines for the Management of Occupational Exposures to HIV and Recommendations for Postexposure Prophylaxis. MMWR Recommendations and Reports. September 30, 2005; 54 (RR-9):1.

Risk of HIV transmission

The risk of transmission continues to be related to exposure to infectious material and the source of that material. Exposure is defined as either percutaneous injury with a contaminated sharp object or exposure of mucous membranes or nonintact skin (skin
that is abraded, chapped or with dermatitis) to infectious material. The current understanding of exposure contingencies is summarized in Occupational Postexposure Table 1.

The risk of HIV transmission (without prophylaxis) is 0.3% (3/1,000) from percutaneous injury and 0.09% (9/10,000) from mucocutaneous exposure. The following are associated with increased risk of transmission: device (needle) with visible blood, needle placed in artery or vein, deep injury, large volume, high viral load.

Efficacy of PEP

The efficacy of AZT monotherapy prophylaxis is estimated to be 80% in retrospective case control series. To date there have been only six recorded prophylaxis failures associated with occupational exposures in the US.


Occupational Postexposure Table 1.   TOP

Exposure Contingenciess
Exposure Element Explanation

Material

Blood or bloody body fluid

Established risk of transmission with
occupational exposure

CSF; pleural pericardial, peritoneal, amniotic and vaginal fluids; semen

Theoretical risk of transmission

Urine, stool, nasal secretions, sputum, tears, vomitus (if not bloody)

CNot potentially infectious

Type of Exposure

Percutaneous

Not severe

More severe

 

Solid needle or superficial injury, etc.

Large bore hollow needle, deep injury, or visible blood on needle/device

Mucocutaneous

Small volume

Large volume

 

Few drops

Major splash

Source of Infectiousness

HIV positive

Low risk
 

High risk

 

HIV positive and asymptomatic,
viral load < 1500 c/mL

HIV positive and symptomatic, AIDS, acute retroviral syndrome, or known high viral load

Source unknown

For example, deceased source person with no samples available for HIV testing


Occupational Postexposure Table 2.   TOP

Indications for HIV PEP
Source Type of Exposure
Percutaneous Muscocutaneous
Not Severe* More Severe* Small Volume* Large Volume*

HIV Positive

Low Risk*†
2 drugs
≥ 3 drugs
2 drugs
2 drugs
High Risk*†
3 drugs
≥ 3 drugs
≥ 3 drugs
≥ 3 drugs

Source Unknown

---
None or
2 drugs‡
None or
2 drugs‡
None or
2 drugs‡
None or
2 drugs‡

* See Occupational Postexposure Table 1 for explanation
† HIV resistance is a concern get expert consultation
‡ PEP is optional based on discussion of risk:benefit


Management of Health Care Workers (HCWs) With Potential HIV Exposure   TOP

The importance of rapid action in the event of a potential exposure cannot be over-emphasized since PEP, if warranted, needs to be initiated within hours.

Assessment

Documentation of the nature and degree of the exposure and the HIV status of the source patient need to be identified. Rapid testing of previously untested source patients is valuable in determining the need for PEP. The need for PEP and potential number of drugs may be determined by using Table 2.

Initiation of HIV PEP

Initiate PEP as soon as possible, preferably within hours after exposure, and continue for 4 weeks. From a practical point of view, PEP should be initiated if the source person is HIV-infected or thought to be infected, especially if the results of HIV serology likely to be delayed. PEP may be discontinued if the source is determined to be uninfected. The current recommended PEP regimens are listed in Table 3.

The following drugs are not recommended because of the potential for adverse events: abacavir, delavirdine, zalcitabine, didanosine with stavudine, and nevirapine. During pregnancy efavirenz should be avoided because of the risk of teratogenic effects and the combination didanosine with stavudine because of toxicity concerns. Additionally, indinavir should be avoided because of side effects in the newborn.

Health care workers taking PEP report adverse reactions at the rate of 17–47%. The most frequently reported reactions were nausea — 27%, malaise and fatigue — 23%. Of 503 HCW who prematurely (<28 days) stopped PEP, 24% did so because of adverse reactions. Regardless, the HCW should be advised on the need to complete the 4–week course of PEP.

Expert Consultation

Consultation with an expert in HIV exposures and PEP is encouraged especially in the following instances:

  • Initiation of PEP is delayed to > 24–36 hrs post-exposure
  • The status of the source patient is unknown
  • The HCW is currently pregnant or is breastfeeding
  • The source patient is known to have a resistant HIV strain
  • There are toxicity problems in the initiated regimen

Monitoring

  • Re-evaluate HCW at 72 hours, especially if additional information becomes available about the status of the source
  • HIV serology testing should be conducted at baseline, and then at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months after exposure; if the HCW experiences hepatitis C seroconversion after exposure, HIV serology should be conducted 12 months after exposure
  • Tests for HIV (P24 Ag or HIV PCR) in HCW are not routinely recommended due to high rates of false positives; these tests should be done if there are symptoms compatible with the acute retroviral syndrome
  • Toxicity monitoring
    Laboratory: CBC, liver and renal function tests at baseline and at 2 weeks; HCWs given indinavir should also have urinanalysis monitoring for crystalluria and hematuria
    Self Report: HCWs should be advised to report rash, fever, back or abdominal pain, dysuria, blood in urine, and symptoms of hyperglycemia; they should also be counseled on the possibility of drug interactions and advised to report these should they occur

Prevention Warnings

HCW with exposure to HIV should be counseled on measures to prevent secondary transmission including: avoidance of blood or tissue donations; pregnancy and breastfeeding, especially in the first 6–12 weeks; and the use of condoms for sexual transmission

Seroconversions

Report any Seroconversion to your local Health Department


Occupational Postexposure Table 3.   TOP

Recommended Regimens
2 Drug Regimen 3 Drug Regimen

Lamivudine or emtricitabine plus

zidovudine, stavudine or
tenofovir

Two nucleosides plus

Preferred: lopinavir/ritonavir
Alternates: atazanavir, fosamprenavir, ritonavir boosted indinavir, ritonavir boosted saquinavir or nelfinavir*

* Consider EFV if PI resistance in source and HCW has no pregnancy risk

Resources for Consultation   TOP

The following resources are available for consultation regarding HIV PEP:

 


Top | Home | HRSA | HHS | Disclaimer | Accessibility | Privacy
| Download Adobe Reader| | Freedom of Information Act