| |
| Tools for Grantees: |
A Pocket Guide to Adult HIV/AIDS Treatment
February 2006 edition |
<
Previous
| Home
Considerations in Occupational Exposure to HIV TOP
PEP Guidelines
Updated US Public Health Service Guidelines for the Management of Occupational Exposures to HIV and Recommendations for Postexposure Prophylaxis. MMWR Recommendations and Reports. September 30, 2005; 54 (RR-9):1. Risk of HIV transmission
The risk of transmission continues to be related to exposure to infectious material and the source of that material. Exposure is defined as either percutaneous injury with a contaminated sharp object or exposure of mucous membranes or nonintact skin (skin
that is abraded, chapped or with dermatitis) to infectious material. The current understanding of exposure contingencies is summarized in Occupational Postexposure Table 1.
The risk of HIV transmission (without prophylaxis) is 0.3% (3/1,000) from percutaneous injury and 0.09% (9/10,000) from mucocutaneous exposure. The following are associated with increased risk of transmission: device (needle) with visible blood, needle placed in artery or vein, deep injury, large volume, high viral load. Efficacy of PEP
The efficacy of AZT monotherapy prophylaxis is estimated to be 80% in retrospective case control series. To date there have been only six recorded prophylaxis failures associated with occupational exposures in the US.
Occupational Postexposure Table 1.
TOP
Exposure Contingenciess
Material
|
Blood or bloody body fluid |
Established risk of transmission with
occupational exposure |
CSF; pleural pericardial, peritoneal, amniotic and vaginal fluids; semen |
Theoretical risk of transmission |
Urine, stool, nasal secretions, sputum, tears, vomitus (if not bloody) |
CNot potentially infectious |
Type of Exposure |
Percutaneous
Not severe
More severe |
Solid needle or superficial injury, etc.
Large bore hollow needle, deep injury, or visible blood on needle/device |
Mucocutaneous
Small volume
Large volume |
Few drops
Major splash |
Source of Infectiousness |
HIV positive
Low risk
High risk |
HIV positive and asymptomatic,
viral load < 1500 c/mL
HIV positive and symptomatic, AIDS, acute retroviral syndrome, or known high viral load |
Source unknown |
For example, deceased source person with no samples available for HIV testing |
Occupational Postexposure Table 2.
TOP
Indications for HIV PEP
HIV Positive |
| Low Risk*† |
2 drugs |
≥ 3 drugs |
2 drugs |
2 drugs |
| High Risk*† |
3 drugs |
≥ 3 drugs |
≥ 3 drugs |
≥ 3 drugs |
Source Unknown |
--- |
None or
2 drugs‡ |
None or
2 drugs‡ |
None or
2 drugs‡ |
None or
2 drugs‡ |
* See Occupational Postexposure Table 1 for explanation
† HIV resistance is a concern get expert consultation
‡ PEP is optional based on discussion of risk:benefit
Management of Health Care Workers (HCWs) With Potential HIV Exposure TOP
The importance of rapid action in the event of a potential exposure
cannot be over-emphasized since PEP, if warranted, needs to be
initiated within hours.
Assessment
Documentation of the nature and degree of the exposure and the
HIV status of the source patient need to be identified. Rapid testing
of previously untested source patients is valuable in determining the
need for PEP. The need for PEP and potential number of drugs may
be determined by using Table 2.
Initiation of HIV PEP
Initiate PEP as soon as possible, preferably within hours after
exposure, and continue for 4 weeks. From a practical point of
view, PEP should be initiated if the source person is HIV-infected
or thought to be infected, especially if the results of HIV serology
likely to be delayed. PEP may be discontinued if the source is
determined to be uninfected. The current recommended PEP
regimens are listed in Table 3.
The following drugs are not recommended because of the
potential for adverse events: abacavir, delavirdine, zalcitabine,
didanosine with stavudine, and nevirapine. During pregnancy
efavirenz should be avoided because of the risk of teratogenic
effects and the combination didanosine with stavudine because
of toxicity concerns. Additionally, indinavir should be avoided
because of side effects in the newborn.
Health care workers taking PEP report adverse reactions at the
rate of 17–47%. The most frequently reported reactions were
nausea — 27%, malaise and fatigue — 23%. Of 503 HCW who
prematurely (<28 days) stopped PEP, 24% did so because of
adverse reactions. Regardless, the HCW should be advised on the
need to complete the 4–week course of PEP.
Expert Consultation
Consultation with an expert in HIV exposures and PEP is
encouraged especially in the following instances:
- Initiation of PEP is delayed to > 24–36 hrs post-exposure
- The status of the source patient is unknown
- The HCW is currently pregnant or is breastfeeding
- The source patient is known to have a resistant HIV strain
- There are toxicity problems in the initiated regimen
Monitoring
- Re-evaluate HCW at 72 hours, especially if additional
information becomes available about the status of the source
- HIV serology testing should be conducted at baseline, and then
at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months after exposure; if the
HCW experiences hepatitis C seroconversion after exposure,
HIV serology should be conducted 12 months after exposure
- Tests for HIV (P24 Ag or HIV PCR) in HCW are not routinely
recommended due to high rates of false positives; these tests
should be done if there are symptoms compatible with the
acute retroviral syndrome
- Toxicity monitoring
Laboratory: CBC, liver and renal function tests at baseline and
at 2 weeks; HCWs given indinavir should also have urinanalysis
monitoring for crystalluria and hematuria
Self Report: HCWs should be advised to report rash, fever, back
or abdominal pain, dysuria, blood in urine, and symptoms of
hyperglycemia; they should also be counseled on the possibility
of drug interactions and advised to report these should they occur
Prevention Warnings
HCW with exposure to HIV should be counseled on measures to
prevent secondary transmission including: avoidance of blood or
tissue donations; pregnancy and breastfeeding, especially in the
first 6–12 weeks; and the use of condoms for sexual transmission
Seroconversions
Report any Seroconversion to your local Health Department
Occupational Postexposure Table 3. TOP
Recommended Regimens
Lamivudine or emtricitabine plus
zidovudine, stavudine or
tenofovir
|
Two nucleosides plus
Preferred: lopinavir/ritonavir
Alternates: atazanavir, fosamprenavir, ritonavir boosted indinavir, ritonavir boosted saquinavir or nelfinavir*
|
* Consider EFV if PI resistance in source and HCW has no pregnancy risk
Resources for Consultation TOP
The following resources are available for consultation regarding HIV PEP:
|