* Instead of having a single state-wide program some states provide HIPs through their consortium. For the purposes of this report, all consortium programs in the same state were counted as one.

Note: Iowa, Michigan and Vermont reported that they spent ADAP funds to purchase health insurance in 2001, however, they did not submit a HIP report. Therefore, allocation and demographic information about their programs are missing.

* Instead of having a single state-wide program some states provide HIPs through their consortium. For the purposes of this report, all consortium programs in the same state were counted as one.

Note: Iowa, Michigan and Vermont reported that they spent ADAP funds to purchase health insurance in 2001, however, they did not submit a HIP report. Therefore, allocation and demographic information about their programs are missing.

Image: Table showing the number of States and EMAs, 1996-200:

* Final FY allocation
** FY allocations for state grantees are final and allocations for EMA grantees are planned.
*** Planned FY allocation

Note: Iowa, Michigan and Vermont reported that they spent ADAP funds to purchase health insurance in 2001, however, they did not submit a HIP report. Therefore, allocation and demographic information about their programs are missing.

*Clients with unknown gender data are excluded from this graph. Gender is unknown for 47 clients.

NOTE: Iowa, Michigan and Vermont reported that they spent ADAP funds to purchase health insurance in 2001, however, they did not submit a HIP report. Therefore, allocation and demographic information about their programs are missing.

*Clients with unknown gender data are excluded from this graph.

*Clients with unknown age are excluded from this graph. Age is unknown for 46 clients.

NOTE: Iowa, Michigan and Vermont reported that they spent ADAP funds to purchase health insurance in 2001, however, they did not submit a HIP report. Therefore, allocation and demographic information about their programs is missing.

*Clients with unknown age data are excluded from this graph.

*Clients with unknown race/ethnicity data are excluded from this graph. Race/Ethnicity is unknown for 227 clients.

**Other includes American Indians, Alaska Natives, people of other races, and people of two or more races.

NOTE: Iowa, Michigan and Vermont reported that they spent ADAP funds to purchase health insurance in 2001, however, they did not submit a HIP report. Therefore, allocation and demographic information about their programs is missing.

*Clients with unknown race/ethnicity data are excluded from this graph.

**Other includes American Indians, Alaska Natives, people of other races, and people of two or more races. This category was expanded in 2000 to include people of other races and people of two or more races.

NOTES: (1) States and EMA in bold first operated a HIP in 2001; (2) An asterisk (*) indicates that State did not submit a HIP in 2001, but indicated that they used ADAP funds to purchase health insurance. An underline indicates that State submitted a HIP and used ADAP funds to purchase health insurance. Shaded States either used Title II or ADAP monies to fund their HIP in 2001.