Table of Contents
:. Introduction
:. Provider Information
:. Client Information
:. Service Utlization
:. HIV Counseling/Testing
:. AIDS Drug Assistance Program
:. pdf file pdf 1MB
Download Printer-Friendly Version
   

 


Provider Information

Using data from section 1 of the CADR, this section describes characteristics of the CARE Act providers that reported data in 2004 (n=2,569). Where possible, comparisons are made with the provider organizations reporting CADR data in 2002 (n=2,696) and 2003 (n=2,647).

REPORTING SCOPE

CARE Act providers have the option of reporting on eligible or funded services. When reporting on eligible services, providers submit data on any service permitted under any title of the CARE Act, regardless of whether or not the providers use a specific title to pay for these services. Reporting eligible services provides a comprehensive picture of the services being delivered to HIVpositive clients by CARE Act-funded providers. More than threequarters (88 percent) of all CARE Act providers in 2004 reported on all eligible services.

Conversely, if providers report on funded services, the data reported by providers include only those services that were actually paid for with CARE Act funding. This latter reporting category requires prior approval from HRSA project officers. In 2004, 11 percent (n=295) of providers reported only those services funded by the CARE Act.

PROVIDER TYPE

A variety of organizations provide CARE Act services, including publicly-funded health centers, community-based organizations, and private medical practices (Figure 1 and Table 1). Almost half (45 percent) of all CARE Act providers in 2004 were communitybased service organizations (CBOs). Hospitals comprised 14 percent of all CARE Act providers, while health departments made up 13 percent of providers in 2004. Collectively, publicly-funded community health centers and community mental health centers represented 10 percent of providers (n=244). CARE Act providers identified as substance abuse treatment centers, solo/group private medical practices, multiple fee-for-service providers, people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) coalitions, Veterans Administration (VA) facilities, or other provider types, comprised 18 percent (n=465) of providers in 2004. The types of organizations receiving CARE Act funding to provide services to people living with HIV/AIDS in 2002 and in 2003 were similar to those funded in 2004.

Table 1. CARE Act Provider Types, 2004

Provider Type Total Percent
Hospitals 360 14%
Publicly-funded community health and mental health centers 244 10%
Communitybased service organizations 1,165 45%
Health departments 333 13%
Other facilities 465 18%
Total 2,567 100%

Data on provider type were missing for 2 providers in 2004.
Other facility includes substance abuse treatment centers, solo/group private medical practices, providers reporting for multiple fee-for-service providers, PLWHA coalitions, VA facilities, and provider type reported as 'other'.
Source: Health Resources and Services Administration, HIV/AIDS Bureau, 2004 CARE Act Data Report.

OWNERSHIP STATUS

The ownership status of CARE Act providers includes private, public, and faith-based organizations. Close to two-thirds (65 percent) of CARE Act providers were private, nonprofit (not faithbased) organizations in 2004 (Table 2). Twenty-three percent (n=592) of providers reported their ownership status as publicly owned (local, State, or Federal), and about four percent (n=113) of CARE Act providers were faith-based organizations.

Table 2. Ownership Status of CARE Act Providers, 2004
Ownership Status Total Percent
Public/local 334 13%
Public/State 240 9%
Public/federal 18 1%
Private, nonprofit (not faith-based) 1,656 65%
Private, for profit 138 5%
Unincorporated 6 <1%
Faith-based organization 113 4%
Other 62 2%
Total 2,567 100%

Percentages may not sum to 100 percent due to rounding error.
Data on ownership status were missing for 2 providers in 2004.
Source: Health Resources and Services Administration, HIV/AIDS Bureau, 2004 CARE Act Data Report.

SOURCE OF CARE ACT FUNDING

Organizations reported which CARE Act programs provided funding for delivery of services. Organizations may have received funding directly from the Federal government as Ryan White CARE Act grantees, through subcontracts with CARE Act grantees, and/or through Title II funding from a consortium agency. Of the 2,569 providers submitting data for 2004, 1,439 providers received Title I funds; 1,398 providers received Title II funds; 454 providers received Title III-EIS funds; and 266 providers received Title IV funds. Thirty providers received Title IV-Youth funds in 2004 (Table 3).

Table 3. Source of CARE Act Funding, 2004
Source Total Percent
Title I 1,439 56%
Title II 1,398 54%
Title III 454 18%
Title IV 266 10%
Title IV - Youth 30 1%

Source: Health Resources and Services Administration, HIV/AIDS Bureau, 2004 CARE Act Data Report

Many of these provider organizations received funding from more than one CARE Act program, and they may have also received funds from additional, non-Ryan White CARE Act sources (Table 4). Among providers in 2004, 70 percent (n=1,790) received funds from a single CARE Act source; 23 percent (n=577) received funds from two CARE Act sources; 7 percent (n=166) received funds from three CARE Act sources; and 1 percent (n=35) received funds from four CARE Act sources. Only one provider received funds from all five CARE Act sources in 2004. Table 2. Ownership Status of CARE Act Providers, 2004

Table 4. Distribution of CARE Act Funding Sources Among Providers, 2004
Source Total Percent
One 1,790 70%
Two 577 23%
Three 166 7%
Four 35 1%
Five 1 <1%
Total 2,569 100%

Percentages may not sum to 100 percent due to rounding error.
Source: Health Resources and Services Administration, HIV/AIDSBureau, 2004 CARE Act Data Report

TARGET POPULATIONS OF INTEREST

Providers were asked to indentify any population group they specifically targeted for outreach efforts or service delivery during the reporting period. The 4 populations that providers most frequently targeted in 2004 were communities of color (65 percent), women (62 percent), injection drug users (49 percent), and gay, lesbian, and bisexual adults (49 percent). These and other target populations are shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Target Population of CARE Act Providers: 2002, 2003, and 2004
Target Populations of Interest 2004 (n=2569) 2003 (n=2647) 2002 (n=2696)
Total Percent Total Percent Total Percent
Migrant/farm workers 218 9% 234 9% 219 8%
Rural population other than migrant workers 515 20% 515 19% 209 19%
Women 1582 62% 1587 60% 1553 58%
Children/child 720 28% 774 29% 771 29%
Communities of color 1656 65% 1710 65% 1649 61%
Homeless 1144 45% 1186 45% 1113 41%
Gay, lesbian, bisexual youth 635 25% 662 25% 632 23%
Gay, lesbian, bisexual adults 1249 49% 1270 48% 1209 45%
Incarcerated persons 604 24% 637 24% 588 22%
All adolescents 581 23% 629 24% 569 21%
Runaway or street youth 285 11% 313 12% 292 11%
Injection drug users 1016 40% 1027 39% 971 36%
Parolees 676 26% 706 27% 626 23%
Other 293 11% 298 11% 325 12%

Providers may check as many target populations as apply.
Source: Health Resources and Services Administration, HIV/AIDS Bureau, 2002, 2003, and 2004 CARE Act Data Reports.

RACIAL/ETHNIC MINORITY GROUP REPRESENTATION GREATER THAN 50%

For 2004, 36 percent (n=919) of all CARE Act provider organizations reported that members of racial/ethnic minority groups comprised more than 50 percent of the organization’s professional staff providing direct HIV services. Twenty-four percent (n=625) of providers reported that racial/ethnic minorities comprised more than 50 percent of their Board of Directors. Two percent (n=50) were solo or group health practices in which more than 50 percent of the clinicians were members of racial/ethnic minority groups. Thirty-four percent (n=879) of providers reported that although their boards and staffs were not composed of a majority of racial/ ethnic minority group members, they historically serve racial/ethnic minorities in communities of color. The racial/ethnic group representation reported by providers remained essentially the same from 2002 to 2004 (Table 6).

Table 6. Racial/Ethnic Minoirity Group Representation Among CARE Act Providers: 2002, 2003, and 2004
Racial/Ethnic Group Representation Greater than 50% 2004 (n=2569) 2003 (n=2647) 2002 (n=2696)
Total Percent Total Percent Total Percent
Board Members 625 24% 668 25% 673 25%
Professional staff members 919 36% 959 36% 945 35%
Solo/group private health practice 50 2% 55 2% 65 2%
"Traditional" provider serving people of color 879 34% 893 34% 911 34%
Other agency type 473 18% 466 18% 463 17%

Source: Health Resources and Services Administration, HIV/AIDS Bureau, 2002, 2003, and 2004 CARE Act Data Reports.

STAFFING

CARE Act providers reported the number of paid, full-time equivalent staff (FTEs) that were funded by the CARE Act along with the number of volunteer, full-time equivalent positions dedicated to HIV care. In 2004, 2,207 provider organizations reported a mean number of 7.6 paid FTE staff per provider, and 686 agencies reported a mean of 11.3 volunteer FTE staff per provider. The mean numbers of paid and volunteer FTE staffs have declined slightly since 2002 (Table 7).

Table 7. CARE Act Provider Organization Staffing: 2002, 2003 and 2004
Staff 2004 2003 2002
No. of Providers Mean Staff per Provider Range No. of Providers Mean Staff per Provider Range No. of Providers Mean Staff per Provider Range
Paid 2207 7.6 .01 - 130 2295 7.9 .01 - 706 2339 8.4 .01 - 780
Volunteer 686 11.3 .01 - 800 747 11.4 .01 - 800 746 11.8 .02 - 750

Source: Health Resources and Services Administration, HIV/AIDS Bureau, 2002, 2003, and 2004 CARE Act Data Reports.

CARE ACT FUNDING AMOUNTS

The amount of CARE Act funds that providers reported receiving is presented in Table 8. The amounts may not match fiscal year awards because provider-reported funding may include carryover from the previous funding period and supplemental funding.

In 2004, 1,345 providers reported receiving $602,715,292 through Title I of the CARE Act with a mean award of $448,115 to deliver CARE Act services. Title II funds totaled $771,321,950 among 1,233 providers, with mean funding of $625,565. Providers in Title III-EIS (n=440) reported receiving a total of $192,813,950, with a mean award of $438,100, and providers in Title IV (n=277) reported receiving a total of $76,366,146, with a mean award of $275,690.

CARE ACT DENTAL EXPENDITURES

The dental expenditures presented in Table 8 include all CARE Act funds from all Titles that were used to pay for dental expenses incurred by CARE Act providers, excluding funds from the Dental Reimbursement Program and the Community Based Dental Partnership Program. In 2004, 585 CARE Act providers reported $47,936,428 in dental expenditures for their clients, with a mean expenditure of $81,943.

Table 8. CARE Act Funding Amounts, 2004
CARE Act Program Total (dollars) Mean Median
Title I $602,715,292 $448,115 $173,269
Title II $771,321,950 $625,565 $95,889
Title III $192,813,950 $438,100 $411,888
Title IV $76,366,146 $275,690 $86,682
Dental Expenditures $47,936,428 $81,943 $20,327

Source: Health Resources and Services Administration, HIV/AIDS Bureau, 2004 CARE Act Data Report.

  Next Page