|
AIDS
Drug Assistance Program
CLIENTS SERVED
In 2002, 52 State and U.S. Territory AIDS Drug Assistance Programs
(ADAPs) served 136,345 enrolled clients. Twenty-four percent of
the clients served by ADAP (n=32,221) were newly enrolled during
the reporting period. The number of clients served by ADAP in 2002
cannot be compared to previous years because two programs failed
to report ADAP data in 2002. However, in the following section on
client characteristics, the proportion of clients served by gender,
ethnicity, race, and age are compared to previous years.
CLIENT CHARACTERISTICS
GENDER
As seen in the Figure 5, the majority of clients served by ADAP
were males (79 percent, n=107,185). In comparison, 78 percent of
the clients served by ADAP in 2001 were males. In 2002, the 52 programs
that reported ADAP data served 29,013 females. Less than one percent
of the clients served by ADAP were transgender (Table 15).
Figure 5. Gender of Clients Served by ADAP, 2002 (n=136,198)

ETHNICITY
Persons of Hispanic/Latino(a) ethnicity comprised 21 percent of
the clients served by ADAP in 2002. Seventy-one percent of ADAP
clients were non-Hispanic/Latino(a) and ethnicity was unknown or
unreported for eight percent of those served by ADAP (Table 15).
RACE
In 2002, African Americans/Blacks comprised 38 percent of the clients
served by ADAP. In comparison, 37 percent of ADAP clients were African
American/Blacks in 2001. Asian/Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander
and American Indians/Alaska Natives combined accounted for less
than two percent of ADAP clients in 2002, and clients reporting
more than one race comprised one percent of ADAP clients served.
Forty-three percent of the clients served by ADAP in 2002 were White.
Race was unknown or unreported for 17 percent of ADAP clients. (Figure
6).
Figure 6. Race of Clients Served by ADAP, 2002 [footnote
22]

AGE
In 2002, 64 percent of the clients served by ADAP were 25 to 44
years of age. Persons age 45 to 64 years comprised 32 percent of
the clients served by ADAP and an additional two percent were age
65 years or older. It is interesting to note that the proportion
of clients served who were 45 years or older continues to increase.
In 2002, 34 percent of ADAP clients were age 45 years or older compared
to 29 percent in 2001. Three percent of ADAP clients in 2002 were
13 to 24 years old and less than one percent of clients were age
12 years or younger (Table 15).
ADAP
FUNDING AND EXPENDITURES
ADAPs receive funding from multiple sources. In addition to the
Title II ADAP earmark and ADAP supplemental funding, ADAPs may receive
funding from Ryan White CARE Act Title I, Title II base, and other
CARE Act funding. Total ADAP funding may include Medicaid; Medicare;
other Federal, State and local government funding; other public
payments, manufacturer rebates, private contributions, and client
payments as well as CARE Act funding. In 2002, the Ryan White CARE
Act Title II earmark was the primary source of funding for ADAP.
In FY 2002, a total of $639,000,000 was awarded to State and territories
for AIDS Drug Assistance Programs; an 8.5 percent increase from
FY2001. ADAPs reported receiving additional funding of $287,921,065
from other sources. This included State and local contributions
of $154,265,290 in 2002.
In 2002, the 52 ADAPs submitting CADR data reported drug expenditures
totaling $820,298,784. State ADAPs spent 87 percent or $710,113,962
of the total drug expenditures on antiretroviral medications (protease
inhibitors (PI), nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI),
non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), and nucleotide
reverse transcriptase (NtRT)).
Table 15. Demographic Characteristics of Clients Served by ADAP,
2002
|
Demographic Characteristics
|
Number
|
Percent
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
Male
|
107,185
|
79%
|
|
Female
|
29,013
|
21%
|
|
Transgender
|
96
|
<1%
|
|
Unknown/
Unreported
|
51
|
<1%
|
|
Total
|
136,345
|
100%
|
Ethnicity
|
|
|
|
Hispanic/Latino(a)
|
28,470
|
21%
|
|
Non-Hispanic
|
96,403
|
71%
|
|
Unknown/Unreported
|
11,472
|
8%
|
|
Total
|
136,345
|
100%
|
Race
|
|
|
|
White
|
58,975
|
43%
|
|
African American/Black
|
51,288
|
38%
|
|
Asian/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
|
1,292
|
1%
|
|
Native American/Alaska Native
|
568
|
<1%
|
|
More than one race
|
969
|
1%
|
|
Unknown/Unreported
|
23,065
|
17%
|
|
Total
|
136,345
|
100%
|
Age
|
|
|
|
Less than 2 years
|
164
|
<1%
|
|
2 –12 years
|
450
|
<1%
|
|
13 –24 years
|
3,468
|
3%
|
|
25 – 44 years
|
86,888
|
64%
|
|
45 – 64 years
|
43,119
|
32%
|
|
65+ years
|
2,167
|
2%
|
|
Unknown/Unreported
|
89
|
<1%
|
|
Total
|
136,345
|
100%
|
Figure 7. Total Drug Expenditures by
Drug Class, 2002

As seen in Figure 7, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
accounted for 53 percent of all drug expenditures in 2002 followed
by protease inhibitors (17 percent) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase
inhibitors (14 percent). Nucleotide reverse transcriptase drugs
comprised four percent of drug expenditures. Drugs used to prevent
or treat opportunistic infections comprised five percent of ADAP
drug expenditures in 2002.
Antiretroviral medications (PIs, NRTIs, NNRTIs, and NtRTs) were
the most commonly prescribed HIV medications provided by State ADAPs
in 2002 (Table 16). It is important to note that these drugs are
prescribed in combination; therefore, a single client may have received
multiple drugs. Stavudine, combivir, and lamivudine (NRTIs) were
the most commonly prescribed drugs in 2002, as they were in 1999,
2000, and 2001.
In 2002, combivir and nelfinavir were the most frequently prescribed
HIV medications by expenditures, as they were in 1999, 2000 and
2002. (Table 17). Together, these two drugs accounted for nearly
a quarter of the total drug expenditures in 2002. It should again
be noted that these drugs are prescribed in combination; therefore,
a single client may have received multiple drugs.
Table 16. Top Ten HIV Medications Prescribed by Number of Clients,
2002
|
Generic Drug Name
|
Drug Class
|
Number
of Clients
|
Expenditures
|
|
Stavudine
|
NRTI
|
44,816
|
$61,415,240
|
|
Combivir
|
NRTI
|
43,785
|
$123,917,630
|
|
Lamivudine
|
NRTI
|
40,826
|
$53,315,661
|
|
Efavirenz
|
NNRTI
|
36,334
|
$67,060,188
|
|
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
|
OI
|
34,384
|
$1,336,355
|
|
Nelfinavir
|
PI
|
23,500
|
$74,402,923
|
|
Didanosine
|
NRTI
|
23,188
|
$28,691,619
|
|
Ritonavir
|
NRTI
|
22,753
|
$65,002,382
|
|
Tenofovir
DF
|
NtRI
|
22,702
|
$30,986,434
|
|
Nevirapine
|
NNRTI
|
22,119
|
$31,969,720
|
|
Abacavir
|
NRTI
|
20,635
|
$37,016,236
|
Table 17. Top Ten HIV Medications Prescribed
by Expenditure, 2002
|
Generic Drug Name
|
Drug Class
|
Expenditures
|
Number of Clients
|
|
Combivir
|
NRTI
|
$123,917,630
|
43,785
|
|
Nelfinavir
|
PI
|
$74,402,923
|
23,500
|
|
Efavirenz
|
NNRTI
|
$67,060,188
|
36,334
|
|
Ritonavir
|
NRTI
|
$65,002,382
|
22,753
|
|
Stavudine
|
NRTI
|
$61,415,240
|
44,816
|
|
Trizivir
|
NRTI
|
$55,436,010
|
17,246
|
|
Lamivudine
|
NRTI
|
$53,315,661
|
40,826
|
|
Abacavir
|
NRTI
|
$37,016,236
|
20,635
|
|
Nevirapine
|
NNRTI
|
$31,969,720
|
22,119
|
|
Tenofovir
DF
|
NtRI
|
$30,986,434
|
22,702
|
|