Table of Contents
:. Introduction
:. Provider Information
:. Client Information
:. Service Utlization
:. HIV Counseling/Testing
:. AIDS Drug Assistance Program
:. Footnotes
:. pdf file pdf 9MB
Download Printer-Friendly Version
   

 


AIDS Drug Assistance Program

CLIENTS SERVED

In 2002, 52 State and U.S. Territory AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs) served 136,345 enrolled clients. Twenty-four percent of the clients served by ADAP (n=32,221) were newly enrolled during the reporting period. The number of clients served by ADAP in 2002 cannot be compared to previous years because two programs failed to report ADAP data in 2002. However, in the following section on client characteristics, the proportion of clients served by gender, ethnicity, race, and age are compared to previous years.

CLIENT CHARACTERISTICS

GENDER

As seen in the Figure 5, the majority of clients served by ADAP were males (79 percent, n=107,185). In comparison, 78 percent of the clients served by ADAP in 2001 were males. In 2002, the 52 programs that reported ADAP data served 29,013 females. Less than one percent of the clients served by ADAP were transgender (Table 15).

Figure 5. Gender of Clients Served by ADAP, 2002 (n=136,198)

Figure 5. Gender of Clients Served by ADAP, 2002

ETHNICITY

Persons of Hispanic/Latino(a) ethnicity comprised 21 percent of the clients served by ADAP in 2002. Seventy-one percent of ADAP clients were non-Hispanic/Latino(a) and ethnicity was unknown or unreported for eight percent of those served by ADAP (Table 15).

RACE

In 2002, African Americans/Blacks comprised 38 percent of the clients served by ADAP. In comparison, 37 percent of ADAP clients were African American/Blacks in 2001. Asian/Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander and American Indians/Alaska Natives combined accounted for less than two percent of ADAP clients in 2002, and clients reporting more than one race comprised one percent of ADAP clients served. Forty-three percent of the clients served by ADAP in 2002 were White. Race was unknown or unreported for 17 percent of ADAP clients. (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Race of Clients Served by ADAP, 2002 [footnote 22]

Figure 6. Race of Clients Served by ADAP, 2002

AGE

In 2002, 64 percent of the clients served by ADAP were 25 to 44 years of age. Persons age 45 to 64 years comprised 32 percent of the clients served by ADAP and an additional two percent were age 65 years or older. It is interesting to note that the proportion of clients served who were 45 years or older continues to increase. In 2002, 34 percent of ADAP clients were age 45 years or older compared to 29 percent in 2001. Three percent of ADAP clients in 2002 were 13 to 24 years old and less than one percent of clients were age 12 years or younger (Table 15).

Man and womanADAP FUNDING AND EXPENDITURES

ADAPs receive funding from multiple sources. In addition to the Title II ADAP earmark and ADAP supplemental funding, ADAPs may receive funding from Ryan White CARE Act Title I, Title II base, and other CARE Act funding. Total ADAP funding may include Medicaid; Medicare; other Federal, State and local government funding; other public payments, manufacturer rebates, private contributions, and client payments as well as CARE Act funding. In 2002, the Ryan White CARE Act Title II earmark was the primary source of funding for ADAP.

In FY 2002, a total of $639,000,000 was awarded to State and territories for AIDS Drug Assistance Programs; an 8.5 percent increase from FY2001. ADAPs reported receiving additional funding of $287,921,065 from other sources. This included State and local contributions of $154,265,290 in 2002.

In 2002, the 52 ADAPs submitting CADR data reported drug expenditures totaling $820,298,784. State ADAPs spent 87 percent or $710,113,962 of the total drug expenditures on antiretroviral medications (protease inhibitors (PI), nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), and nucleotide reverse transcriptase (NtRT)).

Table 15. Demographic Characteristics of Clients Served by ADAP, 2002

Demographic Characteristics

Number

Percent

Gender

 

 

Male

107,185

79%

Female

29,013

21%

Transgender

96

<1%

Unknown/
Unreported

51

<1%

Total

136,345

100%

Ethnicity

 

 

Hispanic/Latino(a)

28,470

21%

Non-Hispanic

96,403

71%

Unknown/Unreported

11,472

8%

Total

136,345

100%

Race

 

 

White

58,975

43%

African American/Black

51,288

38%

Asian/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander

1,292

1%

Native American/Alaska Native

568

<1%

More than one race

969

1%

Unknown/Unreported

23,065

17%

Total

136,345

100%

Age

 

 

Less than 2 years

164

<1%

2 –12 years

450

<1%

13 –24 years

3,468

3%

25 – 44 years

86,888

64%

45 – 64 years

43,119

32%

65+ years

2,167

2%

Unknown/Unreported

89

<1%

Total

136,345

100%

 Figure 7. Total Drug Expenditures by Drug Class, 2002

Figure 7. Total Drug Expenditures by Drug Class, 2002

As seen in Figure 7, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors accounted for 53 percent of all drug expenditures in 2002 followed by protease inhibitors (17 percent) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (14 percent). Nucleotide reverse transcriptase drugs comprised four percent of drug expenditures. Drugs used to prevent or treat opportunistic infections comprised five percent of ADAP drug expenditures in 2002.

Antiretroviral medications (PIs, NRTIs, NNRTIs, and NtRTs) were the most commonly prescribed HIV medications provided by State ADAPs in 2002 (Table 16). It is important to note that these drugs are prescribed in combination; therefore, a single client may have received multiple drugs. Stavudine, combivir, and lamivudine (NRTIs) were the most commonly prescribed drugs in 2002, as they were in 1999, 2000, and 2001.

In 2002, combivir and nelfinavir were the most frequently prescribed HIV medications by expenditures, as they were in 1999, 2000 and 2002. (Table 17). Together, these two drugs accounted for nearly a quarter of the total drug expenditures in 2002. It should again be noted that these drugs are prescribed in combination; therefore, a single client may have received multiple drugs.

Table 16. Top Ten HIV Medications Prescribed by Number of Clients, 2002

Generic Drug Name

Drug Class

Number
of Clients

Expenditures

Stavudine

NRTI

44,816

$61,415,240

Combivir

NRTI

43,785

$123,917,630

Lamivudine

NRTI

40,826

$53,315,661

Efavirenz

NNRTI

36,334

$67,060,188

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

OI

34,384

$1,336,355

Nelfinavir

PI

23,500

$74,402,923

Didanosine

NRTI

23,188

$28,691,619

Ritonavir

NRTI

22,753

$65,002,382

Tenofovir DF

NtRI

22,702

$30,986,434

Nevirapine

NNRTI

22,119

$31,969,720

Abacavir

NRTI

20,635

$37,016,236

Table 17. Top Ten HIV Medications Prescribed by Expenditure, 2002

Generic Drug Name

Drug Class

Expenditures

Number of Clients

Combivir

NRTI

$123,917,630

43,785

Nelfinavir

PI

$74,402,923

23,500

Efavirenz

NNRTI

$67,060,188

36,334

Ritonavir

NRTI

$65,002,382

22,753

Stavudine

NRTI

$61,415,240

44,816

Trizivir

NRTI

$55,436,010

17,246

Lamivudine

NRTI

$53,315,661

40,826

Abacavir

NRTI

$37,016,236

20,635

Nevirapine

NNRTI

$31,969,720

22,119

Tenofovir DF

NtRI

$30,986,434

22,702

 

  Next Page