Table of Contents
:. Introduction
:. Provider Information
:. Client Information
:. Service Utlization
:. HIV Counseling/Testing
:. AIDS Drug Assistance Program
:. Footnotes
:. pdf file pdf 9MB
Download Printer-Friendly Version
   

 


Provider Information

Using data from Section 1 of the CADR, this section of the report describes the characteristics of the CARE Act providers (n=2,696) that reported data between January 2002 and December 2002. The provider information narrative is based on the data tables presented in this section.

REPORTING SCOPE

CARE Act providers have the option of reporting on eligible or funded services. When they report on eligible services, providers are reporting on any service permitted under any title of the CARE Act, regardless of whether or not the providers use a specific title to pay for these services. Reporting eligible services provides a comprehensive picture of the services being delivered to HIV-positive clients. More than three-quarters of the 2,696 CARE Act providers (87 percent) reported on all eligible services in 2002.

Conversely, if providers report on funded services, the data reported by providers includes those services that were actually paid for by a specific Title of the CARE Act. This latter reporting category requires prior approval from HRSA project officers. Thirteen percent of providers (n=357) reported only those services funded by the CARE Act.

PROVIDER TYPE

A variety of different types of organizations provide CARE Act services. Almost half of all CARE Act providers (48 percent) were identified as community-based service organizations (CBOs). Hospitals comprised 13 percent of all CARE Act providers in 2002 and 12 percent were health departments. Collectively, publicly-funded community health and community mental health centers represented 9 percent (n=245) of providers. CARE Act providers identifying as substance abuse treatment centers, solo/group private medical practices, multiple fee-for-service providers, people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) coalitions, or VA facilities comprised 6 percent (n=156) of providers. Other provider types comprised 12 percent of all CARE Act service organizations (Figure 1 and Table 1).

Seven percent of all CARE Act provider organizations (n=181) received Public Health Service (PHS) Section 330 funding. Community health centers and community mental health centers comprised 77 percent of the organizations receiving these 330 funds. Other types of organizations receiving PHS Section 330 funding included other community-based organizations, health departments and hospitals (data not shown).

Figure 1. CARE Act Provider Types, 2002 [footnotes 1, 21] n = 2,696

Figure 1. CARE Act Provider Types, 2002

OWNERSHIP STATUS

In 2002, CARE Act providers reported various types of ownership status. Of the 2,696 CARE Act providers reporting data in 2002, 64 percent were private, nonprofit (not faith-based) organizations. About six percent of CARE Act providers in 2002 (n=151) were faith-based organizations. Twenty-three percent of providers reported their ownership status as publicly owned (local, State, or Federal) (n=599).

Table 1. Provider Type and Ownership Status of CARE Act Providers, 2002 [footnote 1]

Provider type (n=2,696)

Total

Percent

Hospital

355

13%

Publicly funded community health ctr

214

8%

Publicly funded community mental health ctr

31

1%

Community-base service organization

1284

48%

Health department

330

12%

Substance abuse treatment ctr

55

2%

Solo/group private medical practice

50

2%

Reporting for multiple fee-for-service providers

32

1%

PLWHA coalition

16

1%

VA facility

3

*

Other facility

321

12%

Missing

5

*

Ownership status (n=2,696)

Total

Percent

Public/local

344

13%

Public/state

248

9%

Public/Federal

17

1%

Private, nonprofit (not faith-based)

1736

64%

Private, for profit

156

6%

Unincorporated

4

*

Faith-based organization

151

6%

Other

36

1%

Missing

4

*

* Less than 0.1 percent.

SOURCE OF CARE ACT FUNDING

Organizations completing a 2002 CADR were asked to indicate which CARE Act programs provided funding for services delivery. These providers received funding from one or more CARE Act programs. Organizations may have received funding directly from the Federal government as a Ryan White CARE Act grantee, through a subcontract with a CARE Act grantee and/or through Title II funding from a consortia agency. Of the 2,696 providers submitting data in 2002, 1,554 providers received Title I funds; 1,422 providers received Title II funds; 442 providers received Title III-EIS funds; and 265 providers received Title IV funds. Thirty-six providers received Title IV-Youth funds (Table 2).

As previously mentioned, CARE Act providers frequently receive funds from more than one Title of the CARE Act. Many of these same providers also may have received funds from additional, non-Ryan White CARE Act sources. In 2002, 20 percent or 545 providers received funds from two CARE Act sources; approximately 7 percent (n=179) of providers received funds from three CARE Act sources; and 1 percent of providers (n=36) received funds from four CARE Act sources (Table 3). Three providers received funds from all five CARE Act sources. The providers receiving funds from one CARE Act source numbered 1,933 providers (or 72 percent).

Table 2. Source of CARE Act Funding, 2002

Source of CARE Act
funding (n=2,696)

Total

Percent

Title I

1,554

58%

Title II

1,422

53%

Title III

442

16%

Title IV

265

10%

Title IV, youth

36

1%

GRANTEE SUPPORT

Organizations may receive CARE Act funding to provide supportive services to grantees. In some cases, organizations only provide grantees with these supportive services. In others, organizations provide both grantee supportive services and direct client services. In the 2002 CADR, providers reported if they provided any of the following services to their grantee of record: planning or evaluation, administrative or technical support, fiscal intermediary services, technical assistance, capacity development, and/or quality management. Three of these six services were most frequently provided to the grantee of record by a provider agency: planning or evaluation support (539 providers), quality management support (437 providers), and administrative or technical support (406 providers). These categories of support are not mutually exclusive, i.e., an organization may have provided more than one of these support services to the grantee.

TARGET POPULATIONS OF INTEREST

Providers were asked to indicate if one or more specific population groups were targeted for special emphasis, outreach efforts or service delivery during the 2002 reporting period. Among the populations of special interest for the CARE Act grantees, the four most frequently targeted populations included communities of color (61 percent of providers), women (58 percent of providers), injection drug users (46 percent), and homeless persons (41 percent). The remaining targeted population are shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Characteristics of CARE Act Providers, 2002 [footnote 2]

Target populations of interest (n=2,696)

Total

Percent

Migrant/farm workers

219

8%

Rural population other than migrant workers

509

19%

Women

1553

58%

Children/child

771

29%

Communities of color

1649

61%

Homeless

1113

41%

Gay, lesbian, bisexual youth

632

23%

Gay, lesbian, bisexual adults

1208

45%

Incarcerated persons

588

22%

All adolescents

569

21%

Runaway or street youth

292

11%

Injection drug users

1245

46%

Non-injection drug users

971

36%

Parolees

626

23%

Other

325

12%

Missing

1

<1%

Racial/ethnic group representation greater the 50% (n=2696)

Total

Percent

Board members

673

25%

Professional staff members

945

35%

Solo/group private health practice

65

2%

"Traditional" provider serving people of color

911

34%

Other agency type

463

17%

Missing

1

<1%

RACIAL/ETHNIC GROUP REPRESENTATION GREATER THAN 50%

Thirty-five percent or 945 of all CARE Act provider organizations reported that members of racial/ethnic minority groups comprised more that 50 percent of the organization’s professional staff providing direct HIV services. Among CARE Act providers, 25 percent of the organiations reported that racial/ethnic minorities comprised more than 50 percent of their Board of Directors. Thirty-five percent of all providers (n=515) reported that their professional staff consisted of more than 50 percent racial/ethnic minority group members. A small number (2 percent; n=65) were solo or group health practices. Thirty-four percent of providers reported that although their board and staff were not composed of a majority of racial/ethnic minority group members, they historically serve racial/ethnic minorities in communities of color (Table 4).

STAFFING

CARE Act providers report the number of paid, full-time equivalent staff (FTEs) that were funded by the CARE Act along with the number of volunteer, full-time equivalent positions dedicated to HIV care during the 2002 reporting period. Of the CARE Act providers reporting paid staff members (n=2,339), the mean number of paid FTEs was 8.42 persons (Table 5). Among CARE Act providers reporting volunteer staff FTEs (n=746), the mean number of volunteer staff FTEs was 11.82.

Table 5. CARE Act Provider Organization Staffing, 2002

Staff

No. of providers

Mean staff per provider

(Min-Max values)

Paid

2339

8.42

(.01-780)

Volunteer

746

11.82

(.02-750)

 CARE ACT FUNDING AMOUNTS

The amount of CARE Act funds that providers report receiving is presented in Table 6. It must be noted that the following funding amounts are as reported by CARE Act providers and may not match fiscal year awards. Differences between actual fiscal year funding and provider reported funding are due to carry-over from the previous funding period and supplemental funding. A total of $610,095,979 was distributed to 1,438 providers through Title I of the CARE Act. The mean amount awarded to these providers was $424,267 (with some providers being awarded as much as $29,479,811) to deliver CARE Act services. In 2002, 1,277 Title II providers reported receiving a total of $502,396,509. The mean amount awarded to these Title II providers was $393,419. Providers in Title III-EIS (n=397) reported receiving a total of $174,570,230, with a mean award of $439,723. Providers in Title IV (n=247) reported receiving a total of $68,943,223 with a mean award of $279,122.

Table 6. CARE Act Funding Amounts, 2002

CARE Act Program

Total (dollars)

Mean

(Min-Max values)

Title I (n=1438)

$610,095,979

$424,267

($19-$29,479,811)

Title II (n=1277)

$502,396,509

$393,419

($50-$133,000,000)

Title III (n=397)

$174,570,230

$439,723

($450-$1,142,974)

Title IV (n=247)

$68,943,223

$279,122

($1,765-$2,274,327)

Dental expenditures (n=544)

$39,906,041

$73,356

($8-$2,461,363)

The information for dental expenditures (excluding funds from the Dental Reimbursement Program and the Community Based Dental Partnership Program) requires additional explanation. This line item includes all CARE Act funds from all Titles that were used to pay for dental expenses incurred by CARE Act providers. A total of 544 CARE Act providers reported $39,906,041 in dental expenditures for CARE Act clients in 2002. The mean amount of dental expenditures reported by dental providers was $73,356 (with some providers reporting as much as $2,461,363 in dental expenditures).

  Next Page