|
Provider
Information
Using data from Section 1 of the CADR, this section of the report
describes the characteristics of the CARE Act providers (n=2,696)
that reported data between January 2002 and December 2002. The provider
information narrative is based on the data tables presented in this
section.
REPORTING
SCOPE
CARE Act providers have the option of reporting on eligible or
funded services. When they report on eligible services, providers
are reporting on any service permitted under any title of the CARE
Act, regardless of whether or not the providers use a specific title
to pay for these services. Reporting eligible services provides
a comprehensive picture of the services being delivered to HIV-positive
clients. More than three-quarters of the 2,696 CARE Act providers
(87 percent) reported on all eligible services in 2002.
Conversely, if providers report on funded services, the data reported
by providers includes those services that were actually paid for
by a specific Title of the CARE Act. This latter reporting category
requires prior approval from HRSA project officers. Thirteen percent
of providers (n=357) reported only those services funded by the
CARE Act.
PROVIDER TYPE
A variety of different types of organizations provide CARE Act
services. Almost half of all CARE Act providers (48 percent) were
identified as community-based service organizations (CBOs). Hospitals
comprised 13 percent of all CARE Act providers in 2002 and 12 percent
were health departments. Collectively, publicly-funded community
health and community mental health centers represented 9 percent
(n=245) of providers. CARE Act providers identifying as substance
abuse treatment centers, solo/group private medical practices, multiple
fee-for-service providers, people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) coalitions,
or VA facilities comprised 6 percent (n=156) of providers. Other
provider types comprised 12 percent of all CARE Act service organizations
(Figure 1 and Table 1).
Seven percent of all CARE Act provider organizations (n=181) received
Public Health Service (PHS) Section 330 funding. Community health
centers and community mental health centers comprised 77 percent
of the organizations receiving these 330 funds. Other types of organizations
receiving PHS Section 330 funding included other community-based
organizations, health departments and hospitals (data not shown).
Figure 1. CARE Act Provider Types, 2002 [footnotes
1, 21] n = 2,696

OWNERSHIP
STATUS
In 2002, CARE Act providers reported various types of ownership
status. Of the 2,696 CARE Act providers reporting data in 2002,
64 percent were private, nonprofit (not faith-based) organizations.
About six percent of CARE Act providers in 2002 (n=151) were faith-based
organizations. Twenty-three percent of providers reported their
ownership status as publicly owned (local, State, or Federal) (n=599).
Table 1. Provider Type and Ownership Status of CARE Act Providers,
2002 [footnote 1]
|
Provider type (n=2,696)
|
Total
|
Percent
|
|
Hospital
|
355
|
13%
|
|
Publicly funded community health ctr
|
214
|
8%
|
|
Publicly funded community mental health ctr
|
31
|
1%
|
|
Community-base service organization
|
1284
|
48%
|
|
Health department
|
330
|
12%
|
|
Substance abuse treatment ctr
|
55
|
2%
|
|
Solo/group private medical practice
|
50
|
2%
|
|
Reporting for multiple fee-for-service providers
|
32
|
1%
|
|
PLWHA coalition
|
16
|
1%
|
|
VA facility
|
3
|
*
|
|
Other facility
|
321
|
12%
|
|
Missing
|
5
|
*
|
|
Ownership status (n=2,696)
|
Total
|
Percent
|
|
Public/local
|
344
|
13%
|
|
Public/state
|
248
|
9%
|
|
Public/Federal
|
17
|
1%
|
|
Private, nonprofit (not faith-based)
|
1736
|
64%
|
|
Private, for profit
|
156
|
6%
|
|
Unincorporated
|
4
|
*
|
|
Faith-based organization
|
151
|
6%
|
|
Other
|
36
|
1%
|
|
Missing
|
4
|
*
|
* Less than 0.1 percent.
SOURCE OF
CARE ACT FUNDING
Organizations completing a 2002 CADR were asked to indicate which
CARE Act programs provided funding for services delivery. These
providers received funding from one or more CARE Act programs. Organizations
may have received funding directly from the Federal government as
a Ryan White CARE Act grantee, through a subcontract with a CARE
Act grantee and/or through Title II funding from a consortia agency.
Of the 2,696 providers submitting data in 2002, 1,554 providers
received Title I funds; 1,422 providers received Title II funds;
442 providers received Title III-EIS funds; and 265 providers received
Title IV funds. Thirty-six providers received Title IV-Youth funds
(Table 2).
As previously mentioned, CARE Act providers frequently receive funds
from more than one Title of the CARE Act. Many of these same providers
also may have received funds from additional, non-Ryan White CARE
Act sources. In 2002, 20 percent or 545 providers received funds from
two CARE Act sources; approximately 7 percent (n=179) of providers
received funds from three CARE Act sources; and 1 percent of providers
(n=36) received funds from four CARE Act sources (Table 3). Three
providers received funds from all five CARE Act sources. The providers
receiving funds from one CARE Act source numbered 1,933 providers
(or 72 percent).
Table 2. Source of CARE Act Funding, 2002
|
Source of CARE Act
funding (n=2,696)
|
Total
|
Percent
|
|
Title I
|
1,554
|
58%
|
|
Title II
|
1,422
|
53%
|
|
Title III
|
442
|
16%
|
|
Title IV
|
265
|
10%
|
|
Title IV, youth
|
36
|
1%
|
GRANTEE
SUPPORT
Organizations may receive CARE Act funding to provide supportive
services to grantees. In some cases, organizations only provide
grantees with these supportive services. In others, organizations
provide both grantee supportive services and direct client services.
In the 2002 CADR, providers reported if they provided any of the
following services to their grantee of record: planning or evaluation,
administrative or technical support, fiscal intermediary services,
technical assistance, capacity development, and/or quality management.
Three of these six services were most frequently provided to the
grantee of record by a provider agency: planning or evaluation support
(539 providers), quality management support (437 providers), and
administrative or technical support (406 providers). These categories
of support are not mutually exclusive, i.e., an organization may
have provided more than one of these support services to the grantee.
TARGET POPULATIONS
OF INTEREST
Providers were asked to indicate if one or more specific population
groups were targeted for special emphasis, outreach efforts or service
delivery during the 2002 reporting period. Among the populations
of special interest for the CARE Act grantees, the four most frequently
targeted populations included communities of color (61 percent of
providers), women (58 percent of providers), injection drug users
(46 percent), and homeless persons (41 percent). The remaining targeted
population are shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Characteristics of CARE Act Providers, 2002 [footnote
2]
|
Target populations of interest (n=2,696)
|
Total
|
Percent
|
|
Migrant/farm workers
|
219
|
8%
|
|
Rural population other than migrant workers
|
509
|
19%
|
|
Women
|
1553
|
58%
|
|
Children/child
|
771
|
29%
|
|
Communities of color
|
1649
|
61%
|
|
Homeless
|
1113
|
41%
|
|
Gay, lesbian, bisexual youth
|
632
|
23%
|
|
Gay, lesbian, bisexual adults
|
1208
|
45%
|
|
Incarcerated persons
|
588
|
22%
|
|
All adolescents
|
569
|
21%
|
|
Runaway or street youth
|
292
|
11%
|
|
Injection drug users
|
1245
|
46%
|
|
Non-injection drug users
|
971
|
36%
|
|
Parolees
|
626
|
23%
|
|
Other
|
325
|
12%
|
|
Missing
|
1
|
<1%
|
|
Racial/ethnic group representation greater
the 50% (n=2696)
|
Total
|
Percent
|
|
Board members
|
673
|
25%
|
|
Professional staff members
|
945
|
35%
|
|
Solo/group private health practice
|
65
|
2%
|
|
"Traditional" provider serving
people of color
|
911
|
34%
|
|
Other agency type
|
463
|
17%
|
|
Missing
|
1
|
<1%
|
RACIAL/ETHNIC
GROUP REPRESENTATION GREATER THAN 50%
Thirty-five percent or 945 of all CARE Act provider organizations
reported that members of racial/ethnic minority groups comprised
more that 50 percent of the organizations professional staff
providing direct HIV services. Among CARE Act providers, 25 percent
of the organiations reported that racial/ethnic minorities comprised
more than 50 percent of their Board of Directors. Thirty-five percent
of all providers (n=515) reported that their professional staff
consisted of more than 50 percent racial/ethnic minority group members.
A small number (2 percent; n=65) were solo or group health practices.
Thirty-four percent of providers reported that although their board
and staff were not composed of a majority of racial/ethnic minority
group members, they historically serve racial/ethnic minorities
in communities of color (Table 4).
STAFFING
CARE Act providers report the number of paid, full-time equivalent
staff (FTEs) that were funded by the CARE Act along with the number
of volunteer, full-time equivalent positions dedicated to HIV care
during the 2002 reporting period. Of the CARE Act providers reporting
paid staff members (n=2,339), the mean number of paid FTEs was 8.42
persons (Table 5). Among CARE Act providers reporting volunteer
staff FTEs (n=746), the mean number of volunteer staff FTEs was
11.82.
Table 5. CARE Act Provider Organization Staffing, 2002
|
Staff
|
No.
of providers
|
Mean
staff per provider
|
(Min-Max
values)
|
|
Paid
|
2339
|
8.42
|
(.01-780)
|
|
Volunteer
|
746
|
11.82
|
(.02-750)
|
CARE
ACT FUNDING AMOUNTS
The amount of CARE Act funds that providers report receiving is
presented in Table 6. It must be noted that the following funding
amounts are as reported by CARE Act providers and may not match
fiscal year awards. Differences between actual fiscal year funding
and provider reported funding are due to carry-over from the previous
funding period and supplemental funding. A total of $610,095,979
was distributed to 1,438 providers through Title I of the CARE Act.
The mean amount awarded to these providers was $424,267 (with some
providers being awarded as much as $29,479,811) to deliver CARE
Act services. In 2002, 1,277 Title II providers reported receiving
a total of $502,396,509. The mean amount awarded to these Title
II providers was $393,419. Providers in Title III-EIS (n=397) reported
receiving a total of $174,570,230, with a mean award of $439,723.
Providers in Title IV (n=247) reported receiving a total of $68,943,223
with a mean award of $279,122.
Table 6. CARE Act Funding Amounts, 2002
|
CARE Act Program
|
Total (dollars)
|
Mean
|
(Min-Max values)
|
|
Title I (n=1438)
|
$610,095,979
|
$424,267
|
($19-$29,479,811)
|
|
Title II (n=1277)
|
$502,396,509
|
$393,419
|
($50-$133,000,000)
|
|
Title III (n=397)
|
$174,570,230
|
$439,723
|
($450-$1,142,974)
|
|
Title IV (n=247)
|
$68,943,223
|
$279,122
|
($1,765-$2,274,327)
|
|
Dental expenditures (n=544)
|
$39,906,041
|
$73,356
|
($8-$2,461,363)
|
The information for dental expenditures (excluding funds from the
Dental Reimbursement Program and the Community Based Dental Partnership
Program) requires additional explanation. This line item includes
all CARE Act funds from all Titles that were used to pay for dental
expenses incurred by CARE Act providers. A total of 544 CARE Act
providers reported $39,906,041 in dental expenditures for CARE Act
clients in 2002. The mean amount of dental expenditures reported
by dental providers was $73,356 (with some providers reporting as
much as $2,461,363 in dental expenditures).
|