eeeSkip NavigationHRSA 2006 Ryan White CARE Act Progress Report: On the Frontlines

 

Towards Health Equity

Clearing a Path

The single-most critical achievement of the CARE Act is that it facilitates access to care for people who have historically had very little. The results of this achievement are reflected in the demographics of CARE Act clients.

In 2004

  • 59 percent of all CARE Act clients were racial minorities12
  • 23 percent were ethnic minorities12
  • 50 percent lived at or below the Federal poverty line
  • a mere 11 percent had any private health insurance.13

The fact that CARE Act-funded providers are able to reach people in these circumstances represents an enormous victory in the fight to reduce health disparities among minorities and the underserved. This victory is occurring because of the funding and support that the CARE Act gives communities striving to reach people that the larger medical system has failed to reach. It is occurring because of Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) programs like Health Disparities Collaboratives (www.healthdisparities.net/hdc/html/home.aspx), which offer hands-on, disparity-reducing tools for clinical care providers. And it is occurring because providers all over America share HRSA’s commitment to fight for access for people who don’t have it.

After postponing their visits for as long as symptoms allow, many people without private health insurance in the United States go to hospital emergency rooms for acute care. They go seeking treatment for what started as minor infections that could easily have been addressed in a primary care setting. They go suffering from serious diseases they don’t know that they have. And most who go, do so because they have no other choice. It doesn’t have to be this way.

CARE Act-funded providers have shown that we can clear a path toward better health for the underserved. How? By acquiring cultural and clinical skills to address HIV/AIDS. By addressing comorbidities of HIV/AIDS such as hepatitis C and mental illness. By providing access to specialty care like gynecology, oncology, rheumatology, and cardiology. And by recognizing that, for some people living with HIV/AIDS, providing clinical care and treatment alone isn’t enough.

And Then Clearing a Path Again

At the root of inequities in health outcomes lies a shortage of health care services in underserved communities and a shortage of services that are affordable to poor and inadequately insured people. There lies stigma and fear. There also lies undiagnosed HIV infections and lack of awareness that services are available. Community-based collaboration provides a framework for clearing a path through interrelated problems like these and it is why the most successful CARE Act-funded providers almost never work alone.

The CARE Act Amendments of 2000 call for providers to collaborate with “key points of entry” into the medical system—organizations that have relationships with people at high risk for HIV infection, or who are already infected but unaware of their status or who, for some other reason, are not receiving care and treatment. They work in partnership with substance abuse treatment centers and emergency rooms. They create referral relationships with health departments and housing agencies. They go into communities, out into the streets—and into prisons, too.

“Our team goes into correctional settings,” explains Dr. Lawrence Crane, the medical director at the Detroit Medical Center/Wayne State University HIV clinic.

When they are released, many become our patients here. In fact, our clinic is seeing about 75 newly-paroled patients per year now. When I see a patient at a prison who is about to be released, I give him a business card. It’s one of the most important things I do. That card is their lifeline, and I tell them, ‘Make sure the very first thing you do when you get out of here is call the man whose name is on this card. His name is Bernard.’

Bernard Mallisham is a counselor/advocate in Detroit and an expert at linking people with medical care, job training, and housing support—the kind of services that are essential to rebuilding a life and staying in care. There are other people like Mallisham in Detroit and at CARE Act-funded sites all over America. They are the people who make care possible.

And Again and Again

A visit to CARE Act-funded sites reveals the scope of the epidemic among the poor and among minorities. While the pathway to care has been cleared for these individuals, it is still littered with enormous barriers for others. Hundreds of thousands of people living with HIV/AIDS are not in care—many because of disparities in access to health services. Unless we continue to remove the barriers that create those disparities, what will these people do? Where will they go?

Figure 2.S5 Race of Duplicated Clients Served by CARE Act Providers, 2004* N = 900,058 Figure 3.S6 Ethnicity of Duplicated Clients Served by CARE Act Providers, 2004* N = 972,205 Figure 4.S7 Gender of Duplicated Clients Served by CARE Act Providers, 2004* N = 1,005,366 Figure 3.S6 Ethnicity of Duplicated Clients Served by CARE Act Providers, 2004* N = 972,205 Figure 4.S7 Gender of Duplicated Clients Served by CARE Act Providers, 2004* N = 1,005,366

 

 

Table 2. Poor Access to Care = Shorter Lives

Low-income and minority populations have higher rates of cardiovascular disease than Whites. More African-Americans develop high blood pressure, and they do so at younger ages than any other racial or ethnic group.15

Racial and ethnic minorities have higher rates of diabetes than do Whites. For example, African-Americans are 2.4 times more likely to have diabetes than Whites.16

Minorities are less likely to have access to needed mental health services than Whites, and those who do receive such services often receive poorer quality care than Whites.17

Women of color are more likely to report that they are in fair or poor health. One-fifth of African-American women, 29 percent of Latinas, and 13 percent of White women assess their health status as fair or poor.18

Low-income women of color are at greater risk for cardiovascular disease and are less likely to be physically fit than higher income White women.19