|

It is estimated that from 1.39
to 1.85 million people are living with HIV/AIDS in the
United States and that 41,000 new HIV infections occur
each year.12 Health care costs are soaring.
Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is extremely
expensive and HIV/AIDS now strikes hardest among the poor.
Combine these trends with others,
such as increased counseling and testing among vulnerable
populations and financial pressure on other public programs,
and it becomes clear why CARE Act-funded providers are
experiencing growing demand. For example, the Brooklyn
Hospital Center Program for AIDS Treatment and Health (PATH)
saw 180 new clients in 2005. At the Detroit Medical Center/
Wayne State University, the number was 327. Dr. Lawrence
Crane, the Center’s medical director for HIV services,
explains, “We
are funded to treat 1,200 patients, but we have about 1,900.
I don’t know how long the staff can hold out.”
These trends are generating waiting
lists at a time when a generation of providers approaches
retirement. Add a general shortage of health care professionals,
and the issues coalesce to form an emergency quite different
from the one that spurred passage of the 1990 CARE Act, but
an emergency all the same.
Empowered Communities . . .
The CARE Act authorizes a set of
diverse programs with a common mission: to ensure that
underserved people living with HIV/AIDS have access to
care. Everything that the CARE Act funds—from training
a clinician in rural Idaho to providing mental health
counseling to a homeless veteran in Miami—is tied
to this purpose.
The CARE Act works primarily, but
not exclusively, through grants that support delivery of outpatient
medical care, medications and drug treatments, and essential
support services. These grants help the 2,567 organizations
that received CARE Act funding in 2004 work toward reducing
health disparities related to demographic factors like race,
gender, and socioeconomic status.11

. . . Building Continuums of Care
Treating HIV/AIDS requires more than
a prescription. It requires a “service continuum”—an
interconnected set of services to address HIV/AIDS and associated
problems comprehensively. It is this continuum, nurtured by
the CARE Act, that clears away barriers to HIV primary care.
Consider Avis, now a patient at the
Southeast Mississippi Rural Health Initiative, Inc. Avis is
healthy today because of HAART, which she—like most
people without a very good private health insurance policy—could
never afford on her own. This is why the State AIDS Drug Assistance
Program (ADAP)—the largest CARE Act program—exists.
Displaced by Hurricane Katrina, Avis
moved to a new community, where she first lived in temporary
housing. Without the kind of support provided through the
CARE Act, how could she navigate an unfamiliar State bureaucracy
and enroll in a program with enrollment criteria that might
differ from those of her home State? She couldn’t. If
she were beginning HAART for the first time, how could she
be expected to meet adherence requirements without at least
some treatment education? She couldn’t.
The CARE Act’s emphasis on providing
a continuum of services reflects this reality. It also reflects
the fact that serious health problems—especially those
that are debilitating and stigmatizing—require a comprehensive
response. CARE Act grantees have helped build this continuum,
and they continue to build it in underserved communities today.
The result? People with precious few resources have new access
to services that can prevent suffering and an early death.
|
|
Proportion of clients over 65 years of
age3 |
|
Proportion under 25 years of age4 |
|
Proportion with private health insurance5 |
|
Proportion without insurance, public or private6 |
|
Proportion who are female7 |
|
Proportion living below poverty line8 |
|
Proportion who are racial minorities9 |
| *Data
are from the 2004 Ryan White CARE Act Data Report. The
utility of this source is limited by duplicated client
counts. Data from the report collected and reported by
individual providers are generally unduplicated. However,
an individual client may receive services from more
than one provider, and there is no way of knowing that
the counts of individuals served by one provider are
not also included in the counts by another provider.
Thus, aggregating provider data to the national level
results in duplicate client counts. |
|
States and Territories
receiving funding |
|
Number of providers funded in 200410 |
|
Estimated number of clients served
in 2004 |
|