Director's Letter

Although decreasing TB incidence rates might suggest a reduced threat from TB, we know that populations that are hardest hit by TB are also at highest risk for HIV, including minorities, injection drug users, and incarcerated and homeless persons—groups increasingly under our care.

Getting many of these groups into care and keeping them there can be challenging. But coinfection often leads to quicker disease progression and poorer treatment outcomes for both diseases, so prevention and early detection must be our top priorities. That way, we can increase our chances of catching TB before it becomes active, when it becomes more difficult to treat—and to survive. We must work to incorporate TB testing and treatment into patient care—and ensure better retention in care—by encouraging stronger patient-provider relations, improved linkages with health departments, directly observed therapy, and efficient and effective tracking systems for reading TB tests. After all, it is possible to prevent our patients from becoming ill with TB, but only with our continued dedication to providing targeted care to our consumers.

Deborah Parham Hopson
HRSA Associate Administrator for HIV/AIDS

TB Testing

Proper diagnosis of LTBI versus active TB is crucial, because LTBI can rapidly progress to TB disease, particularly in PLWHA. LTBI can be diagnosed by tuberculin skin test (TST; also called PPD [purified protein derivative], the protein used in the skin test) or, less commonly, by using interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) blood tests. TST results need to be read by a health care provider 2 to 3 days after the test is placed. (See insert, Table 1, for more on LTBI testing.)

Since 1989, the CDC has recommended HIV testing for all TB patients, and TB testing has been recommended for all PLWHA for more than a decade.10 Shockingly, a recent study reported that only 54 percent of newly diagnosed HIV patients in the United States received a TST.11 And in 2005, only 69 percent (7,689 of 11,193) of TB patients had ever been tested for HIV; among TB patients with known HIV status, 13 percent (1,034) were HIV positive.12

The 2008 U.S. Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections recommend LTBI testing upon HIV diagnosis and retesting for people whose CD4 nadir reaches <200 cells/µL (but testing should take place after patients begin antiretroviral therapy [ART] and their CD4 cell count increases to ≥200 cells/µL). Annual testing is recommended for PLWHA at risk for TB (e.g., people who have been in close contact with infectious TB patients, have been incarcerated, or live in homeless shelters or other congregate settings; injection and noninjection drug users; children; and people with other sociodemographic risk factors for TB; see insert, Figure 1).13,14

HRSA’s HIV/AIDS Bureau’s Core Clinical Performance Measures for Adults and Adolescents sets forth performance measurement recommendations for TB testing for PLWHA. The goal of performance measures is to improve the quality of care—including TB screening. Because the issue of TB reflects an important aspect of care that affects HIV-related morbidity and mortality and highlights treatment decisions that affect a sizeable population, Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program grantees are encouraged to track the number of clients who have received documented testing for LTBI since HIV diagnosis. Grantees are also encouraged to track the number of PLWHA who do not have a history of positive TB tests or a previous documented positive TST or IGRA. In doing so, grantees will be able to improve quality management and early TB detection and will be able to monitor their findings for areas of improvement.

Increasing testing among PLWHA is critical, because TB diagnosis can be complicated in people who are HIV positive. Chest x-rays may be normal or atypical, and unusual manifestations of TB, including disseminated and extrapulmonary TB (i.e., infection of the kidney, lymph nodes, pleura, spine, brain, and genitourinary tract, among other parts of the body), are far more common among PLWHA—particularly women—than among people who are HIV negative.15,16,17,18 In addition, immunosuppression increases the risk for extrapulmonary TB, although it can occur at any CD4 cell count. PLWHA with extrapulmonary TB are at high risk for disseminated TB, which can progress rapidly and can cause high fevers and sepsis syndrome.

Testing, diagnosis, and treatment recommendations do not differ for HIV-positive pregnant women. TB that goes untreated until late pregnancy can cause complications, such as premature birth, low birthweight and, rarely, congenital TB.

TABLE 1. LTBI Testing19,20,21,22*
Type of Test Testing Method and Turnaround Advantages Disadvantages Cost
Tuberculin
Skin Test (TST);
also called PPD

Purified tuberculin protein derivative is injected under the skin of the forearm by a trained medical provider.

Must be read by a trained health care provider 48 to 72 hours after the test is placed

Generally very safe

Does not require a laboratory

Inexpensive

FDA approved

Less specific than QuantiFERON-TB Gold.TB and T-Spot.TB

Less sensitive in immunosuppressed people (including PLWHA)

Requires training and standardized procedures to place and read TST

Results are contingent upon the patient’s return to have the test read 48 to 72 hours after it was placed

False positive and false negative results may occur

May be reactive in people who have been vaccinated with Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG)

$20-
$26
QuantiFERON-
TB Gold
(interferon-
gamma release
assay)

Blood test;
24- to 48-hour
turnaround
(longer if batched)

More specific than TST testing; prior BCG vaccination does not affect accuracy

FDA approved

Possibility of false-negative or indeterminate results in people with advanced immunosuppression

Laboratory required

$221-
$297
T-SPOT.TB
(interferon-gamma
release assay)

Blood test;
24- to 48-hour
turnaround
(longer if batched)

More specific than TST testing; prior BCG vaccination does not affect accuracy

May be more sensitive than TST and QuantiFERON-TB Gold

Inadequate data on performance in people <17 years old, pregnant women, and people with hemophilia

FDA approved

Possibility of false-negative or indeterminate results in people with advanced immunosuppression

Laboratory required

$221-
$297

*Marks, SM. Division of Tuberculosis Elimination and Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Personal communication. December 29, 2008.

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Trends in tuberculosis incidence—United States, 2006. MMWR. March 23, 2007; 56:245-50.
  2. CDC. Trends in tuberculosis—United States, 2007. MMWR. March 21, 2008; 57;281-85.
  3. Dooley KE, Golub J, Goes FS, et al. Empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia with fluoroquino­lones, and delays in the treatment of tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:1607-12.
  4. Grupper M, Potasman I. Fluoroquinolones in community-acquired pneumonia when tuberculosis is around: an instructive case. Am J Med Sci. 2008;335:141-4.
  5. Bock N, Reichman LB. Tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS: epidemiological and clinical aspects (world perspective). Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;25:337-44.
  6. De Cock K. The new tuberculosis. Afr Health. 1994;16:8-10.
  7. López-Gatell H, Cole SR, Hessol NA, et al. Effect of tuberculosis on the survival of women infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:1134-42.
  8. López-Gatell H, Cole SR, Margolick JB, et al; Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. Effect of tuberculosis on the survival of HIV-infected men in a country with low tuberculosis incidence. AIDS. 2008;22(14):1869-73.
  9. Braun MM, Badi N, Ryder RW, et al. A retrospective cohort study of the risk of tuberculosis among women of childbearing age with HIV infection in Zaire. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;143:501-4.
  10. CDC. 1997 USPHS/IDSA Guidelines for the prevention of opportunistic infections in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus. MMWR. 1997;46(RR-12):10-12.
  11. Lee LM, Lobato MN, Buskin SE, et al. Low adherence to guidelines for preventing TB among persons with newly diagnosed HIV infection, United States. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006;10:209-14.
  12. CDC. Reported HIV status of tuberculosis patients—United States, 1993–2005. MMWR. 2007;56;1103-6.
  13. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. 2008. Accessed November 17, 2008.
  14. CDC. Core curriculum on tuberculosis: what the clinician should know. 4th ed. Atlanta, GA: Author; 2000. pp. 19-20.
  15. El-Sadr WM, Tsiouris SJ. HIV-associated tuberculosis: diagnostic and treatment challenges. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;29:525-31.
  16. Hsieh SM, Hung CC, Chen MY, et al. Clinical features of tuberculosis associated with HIV infection in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 1996;95:923-8.
  17. Keiper MD, Beumont M, Elshami A, et al. CD4 T lymphocyte count and the radiographic presentation of pulmonary tuberculosis. A study of the relationship between these factors in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Chest. 1995;107:74-80.
  18. Yang Z, Identification of risk factors for extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:199-20.
  19. Brock I, Ruhwald M, Lundgren B, et al. Latent tuberculosis in HIV positive, diagnosed by the M. tuberculosis specific interferon-gamma test. Respir Res. 2006;7:56.
  20. Lalvani A. Diagnosing tuberculosis in the 21st century: new tools to tackle an old enemy. Chest. 2007; 131:1898-906.
  21. National Institutes of Health, CDC, Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Guidelines for prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-infected adults and adolescents. 2008. Accessed June 18, 2009.
  22. Pai M, Zwerling A, Menzies D. Systematic review: T-cell-based assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: an update. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:177-84.
  23. American Thoracic Society, CDC, and IDSA. Treatment of tuberculosis. MMWR. 2003;52(RR-11)1-77.
  24. Sterling TR, Hackman J, Horsburgh CR, et al. Design of Tuberculosis Trials Consortium Study 26: once-weekly rifapentine (RPT) + isoniazid (INH) for 3 months vs. daily INH for 9 months for the treatment of latent TB infection (abstract 143). Presented at 4th World Congress on Tuberculosis; June 3-5, 2002; Washington, DC.
  25. McCombs SB. Tuberculosis mortality in the United States, 1993–2001. Presented at CDC Division of Tuberculosis Elimination Seminar; December 2003; Atlanta, GA.
  26. Marks S, Magee E. Characteristics of patients diagnosed with TB at death or who died during TB therapy. Poster presentation. 2008 National TB Controllers Association Conference; June 10, 2008; Atlanta, GA.
  27. Breen, RA, Smith CJ, Cropley I, et al. Does immune reconstitution syndrome promote active tuberculosis in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy? AIDS. 2005;19:1201-6.
  28. World Health Organization. MDR-TB and XDR-TB: the 2008 report.
  29. Gerberding JL. Recent case of extensively drug resistant TB: CDC’s public health response. Testimony. June 6, 2007. Available at: .
  30. Kawai V, Soto G, Gilman RH, et al. Tuberculosis mortality, drug resistance, and infectiousness in patients with and without HIV infection in Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:1027-33.
  31. Murphy RA. The emerging crisis of drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa: lessons from New York City. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46: 1729-32.
  32. Keshavjee S, Gelmanova IY, Farmer PE, et al. Treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Tomsk, Russia: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2008; 372(9647):1403-09.
  33. Kwon YS, Kim YH, Suh GY. Treatment outcomes for HIV-uninfected patients with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:496-502.
  34. Mitnick C D, Shin SS, Seung KG, et al. Comprehensive treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2008:359:563-74.
  35. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Bureau of Tuberculosis Control. Tuberculosis in New York City 1993.
  36. Brudney K, Dobkin J. A tale of two cities: tuberculosis control in Nicaragua and New York City. Semin Respir Infect. 1991;6:261-72.
  37. Frieden TR, Fujiwara PI, Washko RM, et al. Tuberculosis in New York City—turning the tide. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:229-33.
  38. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Annual summary: 2007.